1962 DKW Munga vs. 1998 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 1998 Fiat Bravo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,908 cc (5 cylinders), 1998 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Fiat Bravo (152 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 80 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Fiat Bravo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Munga | 1998 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | DKW | Fiat |
Model | Munga | Bravo |
Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 979 cc | 1908 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 152 HP |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 75.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.7:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 60 L |