1962 DKW Munga vs. 1999 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1999 Mercury Sable is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercury Sable (197 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mercury Sable weights approximately 455 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Mercury Sable. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 1999 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | DKW | Mercury |
| Model | Munga | Sable |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 2982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 80 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1565 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 68 L |
