1962 DKW Munga vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Ranger (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 650 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Munga | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | Ranger |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 979 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 132 L |