1962 DKW Munga vs. 2001 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2001 Jaguar XK is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,995 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Jaguar XK weights approximately 590 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 2001 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | DKW | Jaguar |
| Model | Munga | XK |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 3995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 290 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 86 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 75 L |
