1962 DKW Munga vs. 2002 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJR is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 347 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 555 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 2002 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | DKW | Jaguar |
| Model | Munga | XJR |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 86.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 90.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2910 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 85 L |
