1962 DKW Munga vs. 2002 Rover 45
To start off, 2002 Rover 45 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Rover 45 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Rover 45 (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Rover 45 should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 DKW Munga weights approximately 5 kg more than 2002 Rover 45.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Rover 45. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 2002 Rover 45 | |
| Make | DKW | Rover |
| Model | Munga | 45 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 54 L |
