1962 DKW Munga vs. 2003 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2003 Honda CR-V is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Honda CR-V (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Honda CR-V weights approximately 390 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 2003 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | DKW | Honda |
| Model | Munga | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 58 L |
