1962 DKW Munga vs. 2003 Opel Combo
To start off, 2003 Opel Combo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Opel Combo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Opel Combo (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Opel Combo should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Opel Combo weights approximately 125 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Opel Combo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Munga | 2003 Opel Combo | |
Make | DKW | Opel |
Model | Munga | Combo |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 979 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 81.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 52 L |