1962 DKW Munga vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 531 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Munga | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | DKW | Dodge |
Model | Munga | Dakota |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 979 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1641 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 76 L |