1962 DKW Munga vs. 2004 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2004 Fiat Stilo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,368 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Fiat Stilo (71 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 DKW Munga weights approximately 12 kg more than 2004 Fiat Stilo.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Fiat Stilo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 2004 Fiat Stilo | |
| Make | DKW | Fiat |
| Model | Munga | Stilo |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 1368 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1098 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 49 L |
