1962 DKW Munga vs. 2004 Honda Fit
To start off, 2004 Honda Fit is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,335 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Honda Fit is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Honda Fit (82 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 DKW Munga weights approximately 50 kg more than 2004 Honda Fit.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Honda Fit. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Munga | 2004 Honda Fit | |
Make | DKW | Honda |
Model | Munga | Fit |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 979 cc | 1335 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2460 mm |