1962 DKW Munga vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,685 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 570 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Munga | 2005 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | DKW | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Munga | C |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 979 cc | 2685 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 68.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 62 L |