1962 DKW Munga vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2490 mm |
