1962 DKW Munga vs. 2008 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2008 Toyota Tundra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Tundra (382 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 339 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 220 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 2008 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | DKW | Toyota |
| Model | Munga | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 5663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 382 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 6300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 4190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 100 L |
