1962 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 382 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 850 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Munga | 2009 Dodge Charger | |
Make | DKW | Dodge |
Model | Munga | Charger |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 979 cc | 6059 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 425 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 72 L |