1962 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 283 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Munga | 2009 Jeep Compass | |
Make | DKW | Jeep |
Model | Munga | Compass |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 979 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1393 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 51 L |