1962 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 1021 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR weights approximately 170 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 2009 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
| Make | DKW | Koenigsegg |
| Model | Munga | CCXR |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 4719 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 1064 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2660 mm |
