1962 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Megane (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 2009 Renault Megane | |
| Make | DKW | Renault |
| Model | Munga | Megane |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 79.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 60 L |
