1962 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Ascari A10
To start off, 2010 Ascari A10 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ascari A10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ascari A10 (625 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 582 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ascari A10 should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ascari A10 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ascari A10. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 2010 Ascari A10 | |
| Make | DKW | Ascari |
| Model | Munga | A10 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 4941 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 625 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1852 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1138 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2636 mm |
