1962 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 605 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | DKW | Chevrolet |
| Model | Munga | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 304 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4836 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1918 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1377 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2852 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 72 L |
