1962 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2010 Chrysler 300 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 615 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Chrysler 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Munga | 2010 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | DKW | Chrysler |
Model | Munga | 300 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 979 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1725 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4999 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3048 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 68 L |