1962 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Challenger is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 6,100 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Challenger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 382 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 764 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Munga | 2010 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | DKW | Dodge |
Model | Munga | Challenger |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 979 cc | 6100 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 425 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1874 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5022 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 72 L |