1962 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi weights approximately 360 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Suzuki Kizashi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Munga | 2010 Suzuki Kizashi | |
Make | DKW | Suzuki |
Model | Munga | Kizashi |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 979 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4651 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1481 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 63 L |