1962 DKW Munga vs. 2011 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet HHR (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet HHR weights approximately 321 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Chevrolet HHR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Munga | 2011 Chevrolet HHR | |
Make | DKW | Chevrolet |
Model | Munga | HHR |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 979 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1431 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4475 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1603 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2629 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 61 L |