1962 DKW Munga vs. 2011 Chevrolet Optra
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Optra is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Optra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Optra (120 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Optra should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Optra weights approximately 101 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Chevrolet Optra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DKW Munga | 2011 Chevrolet Optra | |
Make | DKW | Chevrolet |
Model | Munga | Optra |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 979 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 81.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1211 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 60 L |