1962 DKW Munga vs. 2011 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2011 Ford Ranger is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DKW Munga | 2011 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 979 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3193 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 74 L |
