1962 Dodge Polara vs. 1942 Jeep MB
To start off, 1962 Dodge Polara is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Jeep MB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Jeep MB would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1942 Jeep MB. (59 HP @ 3820 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 1942 Jeep MB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Dodge Polara weights approximately 445 kg more than 1942 Jeep MB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 Jeep MB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Dodge Polara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1942 Jeep MB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Dodge Polara | 1942 Jeep MB | |
| Make | Dodge | Jeep |
| Model | Polara | MB |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5905 cc | 2198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3820 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2040 mm |
