1962 Dodge Polara vs. 1966 Mercury Comet
To start off, 1966 Mercury Comet is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Comet. (267 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Comet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Comet weights approximately 250 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Dodge Polara | 1966 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Dodge | Mercury |
Model | Polara | Comet |
Year Released | 1962 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5905 cc | 6393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 267 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2950 mm |