1962 Dodge Polara vs. 1978 Audi Fox
To start off, 1978 Audi Fox is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Dodge Polara weights approximately 613 kg more than 1978 Audi Fox.
Because 1962 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi Fox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Dodge Polara | 1978 Audi Fox | |
Make | Dodge | Audi |
Model | Polara | Fox |
Year Released | 1962 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5905 cc | 1272 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2550 mm |