1962 Dodge Polara vs. 1996 Mazda 121
To start off, 1996 Mazda 121 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 121. (59 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 121. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Dodge Polara weights approximately 461 kg more than 1996 Mazda 121. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 121, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Dodge Polara | 1996 Mazda 121 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Polara | 121 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5905 cc | 1753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1064 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2460 mm |
