1962 Dodge Polara vs. 1997 Ford F-250
To start off, 1997 Ford F-250 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1997 Ford F-250. (232 HP @ 2700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford F-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford F-250 weights approximately 885 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara.
Because 1997 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Dodge Polara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Dodge Polara | 1997 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Polara | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5905 cc | 7275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 2410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3490 mm |
