1962 Dodge Polara vs. 1998 Mazda 323
To start off, 1998 Mazda 323 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP) has 227 more horse power than 1998 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Dodge Polara weights approximately 378 kg more than 1998 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Dodge Polara | 1998 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Polara | 323 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5905 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1147 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2850 mm |