1962 Dodge Polara vs. 1998 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1998 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1998 Toyota 4Runner. (123 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 1998 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 325 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara.
Because 1998 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Dodge Polara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Dodge Polara | 1998 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Dodge | Toyota |
| Model | Polara | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5905 cc | 2982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1850 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1700 mm |
