1962 Dodge Polara vs. 2001 MG X20
To start off, 2001 MG X20 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP) has 124 more horse power than 2001 MG X20. (177 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2001 MG X20.
Because 1962 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG X20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Dodge Polara | 2001 MG X20 | |
| Make | Dodge | MG |
| Model | Polara | X20 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5905 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 177 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
