1962 Dodge Polara vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Dodge Polara weights approximately 15 kg more than 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon.
Because 1962 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Dodge Polara | 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Polara | Space Wagon |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5905 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2790 mm |