1962 Dodge Polara vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (52 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Dodge Polara weights approximately 705 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Dodge Polara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Dodge Polara | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Dodge | Subaru |
Model | Polara | R2 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5905 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2370 mm |