1962 Dodge Polara vs. 2004 Maserati Spyder
To start off, 2004 Maserati Spyder is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Maserati Spyder (385 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1962 Dodge Polara. (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Maserati Spyder should accelerate faster than 1962 Dodge Polara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Maserati Spyder weights approximately 205 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Dodge Polara | 2004 Maserati Spyder | |
Make | Dodge | Maserati |
Model | Polara | Spyder |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5905 cc | 4254 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2450 mm |