1962 Dodge Polara vs. 2005 Ford F-150
To start off, 2005 Ford F-150 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2005 Ford F-150. (300 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford F-150 weights approximately 838 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Dodge Polara | 2005 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Polara | F-150 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5905 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 2363 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3370 mm |