1962 Dodge Polara vs. 2005 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2005 Renault Scenic is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 2005 Renault Scenic. (137 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Scenic weights approximately 15 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara.
Because 2005 Renault Scenic is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Dodge Polara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Scenic will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Dodge Polara | 2005 Renault Scenic | |
| Make | Dodge | Renault |
| Model | Polara | Scenic |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5905 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 137 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2690 mm |
