1962 Dodge Polara vs. 2008 Mazda 3
To start off, 2008 Mazda 3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 3. (257 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 3.
Because 1962 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Dodge Polara | 2008 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Polara | 3 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5905 cc | 2261 cc |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 257 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2650 mm |
