1962 Dodge Polara vs. 2008 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2008 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2008 Mercury Mountaineer. (210 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2008 Mercury Mountaineer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 311 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara.
Because 2008 Mercury Mountaineer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Dodge Polara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mercury Mountaineer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Dodge Polara | 2008 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Dodge | Mercury |
Model | Polara | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5905 cc | 4015 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1836 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2890 mm |