1962 Dodge Polara vs. 2009 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2009 Dodge Ram. (212 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2009 Dodge Ram.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Dodge Polara | 2009 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Dodge | Dodge |
Model | Polara | Ram |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5905 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2900 mm |