1962 Dodge Polara vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R (382 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1962 Dodge Polara. (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 1962 Dodge Polara.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Dodge Polara | 2009 Mercedes-Benz R | |
| Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Polara | R |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5905 cc | 5461 cc |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 382 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3220 mm |
