1962 Dodge Polara vs. 2010 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2010 GMC Yukon is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Yukon (352 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1962 Dodge Polara. (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1962 Dodge Polara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1294 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Dodge Polara | 2010 GMC Yukon | |
| Make | Dodge | GMC |
| Model | Polara | Yukon |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5905 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 352 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 2819 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5649 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2009 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1951 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3302 mm |
