1962 Dodge Polara vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (510 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1962 Dodge Polara. (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1962 Dodge Polara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XF weights approximately 428 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Dodge Polara | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
| Model | Polara | XF |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5905 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 510 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1953 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2908 mm |
