1962 Dodge Polara vs. 2011 Acura TL
To start off, 2011 Acura TL is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Acura TL (305 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1962 Dodge Polara. (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1962 Dodge Polara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Acura TL weights approximately 240 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Acura TL is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Dodge Polara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Acura TL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Dodge Polara | 2011 Acura TL | |
| Make | Dodge | Acura |
| Model | Polara | TL |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5905 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1765 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4928 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1453 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2776 mm |
