1962 Dodge Polara vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz S (613 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 312 more horse power than 1962 Dodge Polara. (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz S should accelerate faster than 1962 Dodge Polara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz S weights approximately 750 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Dodge Polara | 2013 Mercedes-Benz S | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Polara | S |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5905 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 613 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 2275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2120 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1488 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3165 mm |