1962 Ferrari 156 vs. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp
To start off, 1962 Ferrari 156 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ferrari 156 (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (140 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ferrari 156 should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp weights approximately 1139 kg more than 1962 Ferrari 156.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ferrari 156 | 1953 Hudson Super Wasp | |
Make | Ferrari | Hudson |
Model | 156 | Super Wasp |
Year Released | 1962 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1486 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 460 kg | 1599 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 870 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 119 L | 75 L |