1962 Ferrari 156 vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ferrari 156 (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (153 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ferrari 156 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 815 kg more than 1962 Ferrari 156.
Because 1962 Ferrari 156 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ferrari 156. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ferrari 156 | 2000 Ford Puma | |
| Make | Ferrari | Ford |
| Model | 156 | Puma |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1486 cc | 1679 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 460 kg | 1275 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 870 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 119 L | 42 L |
