1962 Ferrari 156 vs. 2003 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1962 Ferrari 156. (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1962 Ferrari 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1962 Ferrari 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ferrari 156 | 2003 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Ferrari | Ford |
| Model | 156 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1486 cc | 4599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 400 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 460 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 870 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 119 L | 68 L |
